Notification about influenza vaccination in Belgium: a descriptive study of how people want to be informed.
Identifieur interne : 000053 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000052; suivant : 000054Notification about influenza vaccination in Belgium: a descriptive study of how people want to be informed.
Auteurs : Inès Van Rossem [Belgique] ; Jan Vandevoorde ; Ronald Buyl ; Sander Deridder ; Dirk DevroeySource :
- Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group [ 1475-1534 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- Wicri :
- geographic : Belgique.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- geographic : Belgium.
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Preference, Reminder Systems, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vaccination.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Influenza causes a substantial socioeconomic burden. In Belgium, only 54% of the target group receives an annual vaccination. Patient reminder/recall systems are effective in improving vaccination rates in primary care, but little is known about patients' preferences on notification of influenza vaccination.
AIMS
To evaluate whether general practice patients wish to be notified of the possibility of receiving influenza immunisation, and how.
METHODS
In January 2008, 750 questionnaires were handed out to all consecutive patients aged >18 years in three Belgian general practices. Main outcome measures were the percentage wanting to be notified, demographic and medical factors influencing the information needs of the patients and the specific way in which patients wanted to be notified.
RESULTS
About 80% of respondents wanted to be notified of the possibility of influenza vaccination. Logistic regression analysis showed that those who had previously been vaccinated particularly wished to be notified, both in the total population (OR 4.45; 95% CI 2.87 to 6.90; p<0.0001) and in the subgroup of high-risk individuals (OR 9.05; 95% CI 4.47 to 18.33; p<0.0001). More than 85% of the participants wanted to be informed by their family physician, mostly during a consultation regardless of the reason for the encounter. The second most preferred option was a letter sent by the family physician enclosing a prescription.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of general practice patients want to be notified of the possibility of influenza vaccination. More than 85% of participants who wanted to be notified preferred to receive this information from their family physician, mostly by personal communication during a regular visit. However, since a large minority preferred to be addressed more proactively (letter, telephone call, e-mail), GPs should be encouraged to combine an opportunistic approach with a proactive one.
DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00012
PubMed: 22430038
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Notification about influenza vaccination in Belgium: a descriptive study of how people want to be informed.</title><author><name sortKey="Van Rossem, Ines" sort="Van Rossem, Ines" uniqKey="Van Rossem I" first="Inès" last="Van Rossem">Inès Van Rossem</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Family Practice, Dutch-speaking University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. ivrossem@vub.ac.be</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Family Practice, Dutch-speaking University of Brussels, Brussels</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Bruxelles</settlement><region nuts="2">Région de Bruxelles-Capitale</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandevoorde, Jan" sort="Vandevoorde, Jan" uniqKey="Vandevoorde J" first="Jan" last="Vandevoorde">Jan Vandevoorde</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buyl, Ronald" sort="Buyl, Ronald" uniqKey="Buyl R" first="Ronald" last="Buyl">Ronald Buyl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Deridder, Sander" sort="Deridder, Sander" uniqKey="Deridder S" first="Sander" last="Deridder">Sander Deridder</name></author><author><name sortKey="Devroey, Dirk" sort="Devroey, Dirk" uniqKey="Devroey D" first="Dirk" last="Devroey">Dirk Devroey</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22430038</idno><idno type="pmid">22430038</idno><idno type="doi">10.4104/pcrj.2012.00012</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000059</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000059</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000059</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000059</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000059</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Notification about influenza vaccination in Belgium: a descriptive study of how people want to be informed.</title><author><name sortKey="Van Rossem, Ines" sort="Van Rossem, Ines" uniqKey="Van Rossem I" first="Inès" last="Van Rossem">Inès Van Rossem</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Family Practice, Dutch-speaking University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. ivrossem@vub.ac.be</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Family Practice, Dutch-speaking University of Brussels, Brussels</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Bruxelles</settlement><region nuts="2">Région de Bruxelles-Capitale</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandevoorde, Jan" sort="Vandevoorde, Jan" uniqKey="Vandevoorde J" first="Jan" last="Vandevoorde">Jan Vandevoorde</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buyl, Ronald" sort="Buyl, Ronald" uniqKey="Buyl R" first="Ronald" last="Buyl">Ronald Buyl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Deridder, Sander" sort="Deridder, Sander" uniqKey="Deridder S" first="Sander" last="Deridder">Sander Deridder</name></author><author><name sortKey="Devroey, Dirk" sort="Devroey, Dirk" uniqKey="Devroey D" first="Dirk" last="Devroey">Dirk Devroey</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group</title><idno type="eISSN">1475-1534</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Belgium</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Preference</term><term>Reminder Systems</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Vaccination</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Belgique</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Préférence du patient</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Systèmes d'aide-mémoire</term><term>Vaccination</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Belgium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Preference</term><term>Reminder Systems</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Vaccination</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Belgique</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Préférence du patient</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Systèmes d'aide-mémoire</term><term>Vaccination</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Belgique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Influenza causes a substantial socioeconomic burden. In Belgium, only 54% of the target group receives an annual vaccination. Patient reminder/recall systems are effective in improving vaccination rates in primary care, but little is known about patients' preferences on notification of influenza vaccination.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>AIMS</b></p><p>To evaluate whether general practice patients wish to be notified of the possibility of receiving influenza immunisation, and how.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>In January 2008, 750 questionnaires were handed out to all consecutive patients aged >18 years in three Belgian general practices. Main outcome measures were the percentage wanting to be notified, demographic and medical factors influencing the information needs of the patients and the specific way in which patients wanted to be notified.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>About 80% of respondents wanted to be notified of the possibility of influenza vaccination. Logistic regression analysis showed that those who had previously been vaccinated particularly wished to be notified, both in the total population (OR 4.45; 95% CI 2.87 to 6.90; p<0.0001) and in the subgroup of high-risk individuals (OR 9.05; 95% CI 4.47 to 18.33; p<0.0001). More than 85% of the participants wanted to be informed by their family physician, mostly during a consultation regardless of the reason for the encounter. The second most preferred option was a letter sent by the family physician enclosing a prescription.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>The majority of general practice patients want to be notified of the possibility of influenza vaccination. More than 85% of participants who wanted to be notified preferred to receive this information from their family physician, mostly by personal communication during a regular visit. However, since a large minority preferred to be addressed more proactively (letter, telephone call, e-mail), GPs should be encouraged to combine an opportunistic approach with a proactive one.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22430038</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1475-1534</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>21</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Prim Care Respir J</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Notification about influenza vaccination in Belgium: a descriptive study of how people want to be informed.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>308-12</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.4104/pcrj.2012.00012</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Influenza causes a substantial socioeconomic burden. In Belgium, only 54% of the target group receives an annual vaccination. Patient reminder/recall systems are effective in improving vaccination rates in primary care, but little is known about patients' preferences on notification of influenza vaccination.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="AIMS" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To evaluate whether general practice patients wish to be notified of the possibility of receiving influenza immunisation, and how.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">In January 2008, 750 questionnaires were handed out to all consecutive patients aged >18 years in three Belgian general practices. Main outcome measures were the percentage wanting to be notified, demographic and medical factors influencing the information needs of the patients and the specific way in which patients wanted to be notified.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">About 80% of respondents wanted to be notified of the possibility of influenza vaccination. Logistic regression analysis showed that those who had previously been vaccinated particularly wished to be notified, both in the total population (OR 4.45; 95% CI 2.87 to 6.90; p<0.0001) and in the subgroup of high-risk individuals (OR 9.05; 95% CI 4.47 to 18.33; p<0.0001). More than 85% of the participants wanted to be informed by their family physician, mostly during a consultation regardless of the reason for the encounter. The second most preferred option was a letter sent by the family physician enclosing a prescription.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The majority of general practice patients want to be notified of the possibility of influenza vaccination. More than 85% of participants who wanted to be notified preferred to receive this information from their family physician, mostly by personal communication during a regular visit. However, since a large minority preferred to be addressed more proactively (letter, telephone call, e-mail), GPs should be encouraged to combine an opportunistic approach with a proactive one.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Van Rossem</LastName><ForeName>Inès</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Family Practice, Dutch-speaking University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. ivrossem@vub.ac.be</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vandevoorde</LastName><ForeName>Jan</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Buyl</LastName><ForeName>Ronald</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Deridder</LastName><ForeName>Sander</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Devroey</LastName><ForeName>Dirk</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Prim Care Respir J</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101121543</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1471-4418</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentIn"><RefSource>Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Sep;21(3):248-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22836741</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001530" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Belgium</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057240" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Preference</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017010" MajorTopicYN="Y">Reminder Systems</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014611" MajorTopicYN="Y">Vaccination</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22430038</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">pcrj-2011-10-0126</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4104/pcrj.2012.00012</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC6547949</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>JAMA. 2000 Oct 11;284(14):1820-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11025835</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000 Nov;19(11):834-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11152308</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(35):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-170</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14609480</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lancet. 2003 Nov 22;362(9397):1733-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14643124</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Nov 5;53(43):1012-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15525898</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jun;28(5 Suppl):248-79</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15894160</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003941</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16034918</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1555-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18799552</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):547-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19850275</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2010 Feb 17;28(7):1684-701</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20005855</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 08;(9):CD005188</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20824843</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>JAMA. 1988 Dec 9;260(22):3253-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3184408</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):138-43</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9613481</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Belgique</li></country><region><li>Région de Bruxelles-Capitale</li></region><settlement><li>Bruxelles</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Buyl, Ronald" sort="Buyl, Ronald" uniqKey="Buyl R" first="Ronald" last="Buyl">Ronald Buyl</name><name sortKey="Deridder, Sander" sort="Deridder, Sander" uniqKey="Deridder S" first="Sander" last="Deridder">Sander Deridder</name><name sortKey="Devroey, Dirk" sort="Devroey, Dirk" uniqKey="Devroey D" first="Dirk" last="Devroey">Dirk Devroey</name><name sortKey="Vandevoorde, Jan" sort="Vandevoorde, Jan" uniqKey="Vandevoorde J" first="Jan" last="Vandevoorde">Jan Vandevoorde</name></noCountry><country name="Belgique"><region name="Région de Bruxelles-Capitale"><name sortKey="Van Rossem, Ines" sort="Van Rossem, Ines" uniqKey="Van Rossem I" first="Inès" last="Van Rossem">Inès Van Rossem</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/GrippeBelgiqueV4/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000053 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000053 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= GrippeBelgiqueV4
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22430038
|texte= Notification about influenza vaccination in Belgium: a descriptive study of how people want to be informed.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22430038" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeBelgiqueV4
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |